<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware Is Absolutely Not a Dead Duck!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.havemacwillblog.com/2007/11/30/vmware-is-absolutely-not-a-dead-duck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.havemacwillblog.com/2007/11/30/vmware-is-absolutely-not-a-dead-duck/</link>
	<description>One man, one blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 07:44:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the Philosopher</title>
		<link>http://www.havemacwillblog.com/2007/11/30/vmware-is-absolutely-not-a-dead-duck/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>the Philosopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havemacwillblog.com/2007/11/30/vmware-is-absolutely-not-a-dead-duck/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>You have arguments that are not very valid.

4. VMware&#039;s stock market value is very volatile. There is no guarantee the stock value won&#039;t drop another 40% in the next months. Check the graph. You don&#039;t have a point here.

1. Kuznetsky&#039;s &quot;simple diagram&quot; contains application virtualization. There is no such thing. However, the diagram shows the area where hardware virtualization comes in. That&#039;s vmware, Xen, kvm amongst others. Hardware virtualization is just that; it acts as more hardware than you actually have. What more does vmware deliver exactly?

2. Your examples are on a different level than hardware virtualization. As little you would care if you have HP or Dell stuff to run Oracle on, you wouldn&#039;t care about your hypervisor brand. The only thing needed is a company that does the installation for you, who will be responsible for maintenance. Like RedHat. You will find that whitin a couple of years, hardware virtualization is a commodity.

3. Implementation costs are comparable in vmware cases. The licenses for free are free. How does xensource/xenserver and kvm lack scaling?

5. What?
No Vmware is not dead and will be around for a long while, but it will be of much less value than it is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have arguments that are not very valid.</p>
<p>4. VMware&#8217;s stock market value is very volatile. There is no guarantee the stock value won&#8217;t drop another 40% in the next months. Check the graph. You don&#8217;t have a point here.</p>
<p>1. Kuznetsky&#8217;s &#8220;simple diagram&#8221; contains application virtualization. There is no such thing. However, the diagram shows the area where hardware virtualization comes in. That&#8217;s vmware, Xen, kvm amongst others. Hardware virtualization is just that; it acts as more hardware than you actually have. What more does vmware deliver exactly?</p>
<p>2. Your examples are on a different level than hardware virtualization. As little you would care if you have HP or Dell stuff to run Oracle on, you wouldn&#8217;t care about your hypervisor brand. The only thing needed is a company that does the installation for you, who will be responsible for maintenance. Like RedHat. You will find that whitin a couple of years, hardware virtualization is a commodity.</p>
<p>3. Implementation costs are comparable in vmware cases. The licenses for free are free. How does xensource/xenserver and kvm lack scaling?</p>
<p>5. What?<br />
No Vmware is not dead and will be around for a long while, but it will be of much less value than it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.havemacwillblog.com @ 2012-02-12 04:51:41 -->
